This is a response to a comment I received in my blog about the Harlequin Horizons vanity press venture. I won’t post her comment here (you can read it here if you want to), but basically, the commentor in question was refuting the fact that Harl Ho was vanity press, saying it was ‘assisted publishing’ instead. I did respond to her comments there, but I thought it worth putting up here on the main blog page, because given some of the comments I’ve read elsewhere online, she’s not alone in thinking ‘assisted publishing’ is a different kettle of fish to vanity press. So, here goes:

Eva, Harl Horizons (Or Dellarte Press as they’re now calling themselves), is NOT assisted publishing. It’s vanity publishing, pure and simple. YOU PAY THEM to publish your books, and then you give them half of your royalties as well. That does not sound like a good deal to me. How our they assisting you? All they’re doing is providing editorial services (at a cost), printing your book (at a cost) and providing distribution services (at a cost). And those distribution services are nothing that you, as a self pubbed author, cannot do yourself (amazon don’t charge authors to list books–anyone can do it if you have an isbn). I have nothing against self or vanity publishing if that’s the route you want to go, but please be aware that there are cheaper options out there.

As for your comments on traditional publishing and royalties–5% is on the low side. Most authors get around 8%. Which might not sound much, but consider the fact that with traditional publishers you’re getting your books in store and online–with self/vanity publishing, you’re only available online, and then only minimally. Also, trad publishing provides all the publicity and backing, and they’re taking the risk cost wise, not the author. The author is paid an advance and may never get more than that, but at least they have money in hand, up front. With a self/vanity publisher, the author shells out money upfront, and takes all the risk themselves. They may never make their money back, let alone a profit, as the average number of sales for a self/vanity press book is around 79 copies sold. The average trad published author will sell at least several thousand (although if they only sold that, it’d be unlikely they’d be offered another contract).

Agents are worth their weight in gold, and don’t ever believe otherwise. For a start, they get your books in front of editors. Most traditional houses nowadays don’t take unsolicited manuscripts, and unless you’ve got an agent your market options has shrunk considerably. Plus, they often not only negotiate better money, but better contract conditions–a vital service in this day and age of publishers wanting everything they can get, believe me! And they also handle overseas sales–which can be a legal minefield for those who have no idea (which is most of us, lets be honest)

As for those figures you quoted–did you actually read the full breakdown? Because yeah, it may cost a publisher $58,000 for a Trade, and $90 000 to publish a hardcover, but those figures include author royalties of $15 000 and $25 000. So as a self/vanity press author, you can deduct that figure for a start. You can also greatly reduce the printing and binding costs, because they’d be based on print runs of at least ten thousand, which no self/vanity author would generally do. Warehousing costs can also be taken out because why would you need to rent a warehouse when a garage or a room in your house will do? Because I’m not sure whether the sales mentioned is sale staff costs, or not, I’ll leave that in. Which brings the totals down to $18 000 and $26 000, and that is the type of money I’ve seen some self / vanity authors spend. The major difference is, in one model, the author is taking all the risks, shells out all the money, and has very little hope of getting any returns. In the other, the publisher is taking the risk, the publisher is providing the warehousing and staff, the publisher is providing the marketing, and the publisher is offering the means of getting your book onto store shelves. Which, despite the kindle, e-readers, and the advent of online sales and stores, is still where 95% of book purchases occur.

As for your comments about second class authors, well, I’ll just say I very much doubt any agent or editor has ever said that. Yes, they more than likely have said your work is not ready for publication, but that’s something every published author has heard more than once in their publishing career. Hell, I read those words in rejection letters for at least ten years. And they were right! My work wasn’t ready for publication, even if I thought otherwise at the time.

As I said, I have nothing against authors choosing to go the self published or vanity press route, but I certainly wish more would see past the glossy images and carefully worded promises offered on glossy websites.

edited to add–for those wanting to check out Rachelle Gardner’s post of the cost of publishing, head here

Wordle is a toy for generating “word clouds” from text that you provide. The clouds give greater prominence to words that appear more frequently in the source text. So today I went there and posted in the latest book, just for the fun of seeing what words I overuse. And, as expected, the ones I shouldn’t overuse are the ones that popped up the biggest. Like like and just ! lol. Lots of editing ahead.

here’s the pic (if you want to see it larger, just click the pic):
Wordle: kez

Anyone who has any involvement in romance writing will be aware of the current uproar over Harlequin’s decision this week to announce the arrival of Harlequin Horizons–a vanity press they’re opening up in partnership with Author Solutions. Please note that I said vanity press, not self publishing. Harlequin is might be trying to sell this venture as a self publishing option for authors, but the two are very different.

In self publishing, the author does it all– they not only write the book, but also arrange for its design, printing, marketing, and distribution. They’re 100% involved at all levels. And they get to keep 100% of any subsequent sales.

With a vanity press, someone else holds the reins. The author pays for a third party to edit it, they pay for (usually limited) artwork, they pay for production, but they only get to keep a percentage of sales (in the Harlequin Horizons case, authors get 50% of net.) Oh, and they generally also have the opportunity to pay yet more money for “distribution packages” which will not get them into bookstores.

I won’t go into why I think this whole situation stinks to high heaven–mainly because Jackie Kessler has already done that a whole lot more eloquently than I ever could. I will say, however, that I think its morally reprehensible that a major publisher like Harlequin brands its vanity press Harlequin Horizons and then states that the books produced will not have Harlequin support or branding. So why is Harlequin advertising the venture all over its forums? Why have editors been directed to note on all rejection letters that Harlequin Horizons is an available option? Why call it Harlequin Horizons at all?

Harlequin wouldn’t be the first publisher to be involved with vanity press. Random House own 49% of Xlibris, but the difference is, there’s no branding conflict. The two are clearly separated and Random House editors are NOT recommending on rejection letters that authors go visit Xlibris.

But the real WTF moment for me came from an answer Malle Vallik gave to this following question over on the Dear Author site:

If an author chooses to go to Horizons, do they lose “first publication” rights? How will that affect any effort to gain an agent or traditional publisher with their “bound copy”?

Malle’s answer: I’m not sure I completely understand this question. The author owns her content. How would she lost first publication rights? She has published it herself. Whether she is giving it away as gifts or marketing it, is up to her. Yup, clearly I don’t get your question.

I mean, seriously, I realized Malle was getting bombarded by questions and a whole lot of anger (and I applaud her bravery in staying there as long as she did–and remaining calm), but how could an editor (or former editor) not understand that question when first publication rights are the very thing that all editors buy?

To put it bluntly,  if you publish it anywhere, in any form, in its entirety, then you’ve lost first publication rights and most editors wouldn’t touch you with a long wooden pole. If you’re famous, with a history of good sales behind you, then that might be a different story–but you still wouldn’t be selling first publishing right. You’d be selling reprinting rights.

As I said, I think this whole situation stinks. If vanity publication is the path you want to take (and I would personally never, ever recommend this path to any fiction author), then there are better (cheaper) options out there. Harlequin are charging through the roof ($600–1500 for their services) and then taking 50% of net. On average, most vanity published books sell 75 copies. Do your sums and guess who is going to be out of pocket. Not Harlequin.

Edited to add: Here’s an agents take on it

Diana McCabe over at the Paranormal Romance blog has just posted a Q & A with me, so head on over there if you’re interested in reading some answers about Riley’s series.

In other news….there’s not a whole lot. My lovely agent sent me some beautiful roses in a vase for hitting the Times list, but I wasn’t quick enough to take a photo and now I’m afraid they’re looking a bit sad, thanks to the heat of the last few days. At least I’ll have the vase as a momento.  :)

Writing wise, the going has been slow. I’m trying to write a sex scene, and the muse, she’s just not interested. Part of me thinks I should skip ahead to the next scene and come back to the sex later, but I’ve never been able to write like that and really don’t think it’d work now. So, I struggle on. I’m almost half way through the book now, but if the struggle continues, I can’t see me getting it finished by Christmas like I want to.

Anne (my editor) asked if I wanted to use the same old author shot or send a new one. Given I hate the old one, I jumped at the chance. After dragging my daughter off her Mac (no easy task, let me tell you), we headed out to the garden to grab some shots. In the process, we took some shots of me with my dogs. I’d love to use the first one as my author shot. It’s so me….
keri2b

DSC00529a

DSC00530a

thanks to my lovely editor and most awesome agent, I learned today that Bound to Shadows is #6 on the NYT list in its debut week! How absolutely brilliant is that? :) So, a huge thanks to everyone who preordered the book, or who went out and purchased it ASAP–I’m only on the list thanks to you guys and gals!

In other news, Deadly Desire went back for reprint, which is also totally awesome (and it means it’s still selling well, which is always good news for an author–and it keeps the publisher happy.) Also, for those of you in the UK, Book Chick City has an interview up with me, and she’s also giving away a copy of Bound to Shadows.

In writing news, I actually managed to get some writing done, even though there was mucho excitement over the Times news. Risa continues to roll along, and Director Hunter has made it onto the page. Apparently, she doesn’t like McDonalds coffee. lol

Finally got my rear into gear and drew the winner of my latest website contest. So, without further delay (and with an imaginary drumroll playing in the background) it’s my pleasure to announce the new owner of Victor the vampire Beanie Bear is….Shelly! Congrats.

In other news…well, there isn’t a whole lot when it comes to writing. It was basically a long weekend here in Melbourne (technically it wasn’t, but most Victorians take the Monday off before the Melbourne Cup, thereby giving themselves a four day weekend), and for a change, I took it off as well. No writing for me. I ate, I visited, I gossiped with friends, and I had a damn fine time. I did do a couple of Q&A’s for various blog sites, but that was the extent of the brain drain. Of course, now I’m having trouble getting back into writing again. The muse, she is tricky. lol

There’s more reviews of Bound to Shadows appearing on the web, and one of them is giving away a copy of Bound to Shadows as a prize. Just click the links below to check them out :)

Anna’s book blog (review. Giveaway ended 31 Oct.)

Readaholic (review and givaway. Open only to US & Canada residents)

Fiction Vixen (review)

Bound to Shadows artwork by Larry Rostant, represented by Artist Partners. Used with permission. 
 
An Austin DesignWorks Production